This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: RFA: Port maintainers: Convert WORDSIZE[32|64]/ld to abi-variants


On 05/30/2012 09:59 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 1:49 AM, Andreas Krebbel
> <krebbel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>> On 05/30/2012 02:29 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>> On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Joseph S. Myers
>>> <joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 26 May 2012, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I restored sh and sparc entries in shlib-versions on hjl/abi branch.
>>>>> The new patch is at
>>>>>
>>>>> http://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=patch;h=0d1f492b3cf83a200601c1f49734b048c5547e57
>>>> Provided the new version passes architecture maintainer testing I think it
>>>> will probably be OK for 2.16, given the comments Roland requested saying
>>>> that the use of soname variables set in makefiles is wrong and a bug filed
>>>> with a 2.17 milestone to get this cleaned up properly along the lines I
>>>> proposed (naming ABI variants, not triplets, in shlib-versions, with all
>>>> the architecture information in shlib-versions moving to appropriate
>>>> sysdeps directories shared by all the ABI variants of each architecture).
>>>>
>>> I rebased hjl/abi branch.  Has anyone verified it on sparc, powerpc an s390x?
>> I've tested your patch on s390 and s390x. No regressions.
>>
>> Bye,
>>
>> -Andreas-
>>
> Adhemerval,
>
> Can you test hjl/abi branch on powerpc?
>
> Thanks.
>
>

Yes, I have tested and got expected make check failures, so it is ok.


-- 
Adhemerval Zanella Netto
  Software Engineer
  Linux Technology Center Brazil
  Toolchain / GLIBC on Power Architecture
  azanella@linux.vnet.ibm.com / azanella@br.ibm.com
  +55 61 8642-9890


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]