This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Static TLS size and stack size

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo dot org>
To: libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
Cc: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at systemhalted dot org>,Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh at redhat dot com>,Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 00:58:03 -0400
Subject: Re: Static TLS size and stack size
References: <mcrbokxyjkv.fsf@dhcp-172-18-216-180.mtv.corp.google.com> <20120605190438.1651b2e5@spoyarek> <CADZpyiyJNoteLY3AObMHD6yNabBiF6E4jop48a0JtcfxbBXV5g@mail.gmail.com>

On Tuesday 05 June 2012 10:30:09 Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Siddhesh Poyare wrote:
> > http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11787
> 
> A fix for this bug will definitely be going into 2.16, but I'm
> hesitant to backport something like this to 2.15.1 because it changes
> the behaviour of the allocations.

it's not like it's a regression, so skipping 2.15.x is OK i think
-mike

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

References:
- Static TLS size and stack size
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Static TLS size and stack size
  - From: Siddhesh Poyarekar
- Re: Static TLS size and stack size
  - From: Carlos O'Donell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]