This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Optimized with SSE2 sinf and cof for x86_32

From: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
To: Dmitrieva Liubov <liubov dot dmitrieva at gmail dot com>
Cc: <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>, Ulrich Drepper <drepper at gmail dot com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 15:33:43 +0000
Subject: Re: Optimized with SSE2 sinf and cof for x86_32
References: <CAHjhQ91iSZzUSaDs_MRO3AzzS-KjH7nBp=4ze_NoSTyomsbcHg@mail.gmail.com><Pine.LNX.4.64.1206221447580.4035@digraph.polyomino.org.uk><CAHjhQ92bwsJkE-rH2zweV1dKJeajtsO2Yv+1C43g_LVnH_6P0g@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, 22 Jun 2012, Dmitrieva Liubov wrote:

> > Are you sure about *current* there - that is, using the flt-32 C
> > implementations?
> 
> We use current GLIBC master version taken on 2012/06/21 for testing.
> Sure, I can report a bug to http://sourceware.org/bugzilla.

Thanks, please do.  We have a general rule that if someone discovers a 
bug, not present in Bugzilla, while developing a patch, they should report 
it in Bugzilla, whether or not their patch will fix that bug, so that 
searching for fixed bugs in Bugzilla is more useful.  (And in this case, 
your patch will fix the bug at most for SSE2 - the x87 case of the bug 
will still need fixing.)

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com

References:
- Optimized with SSE2 sinf and cof for x86_32
  - From: Dmitrieva Liubov
- Re: Optimized with SSE2 sinf and cof for x86_32
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: Optimized with SSE2 sinf and cof for x86_32
  - From: Dmitrieva Liubov

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]