This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Ping Re: Avoid use of libgcc_s and libgcc_eh when building glibc


On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Joseph S. Myers
<joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Jun 2012, H.J. Lu wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Joseph S. Myers
>> <joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>> > On Tue, 12 Jun 2012, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
>> >
>> >> The present patch (now presumably for glibc 2.17) aims at a more modest
>> >> incremental improvement on the glibc side. ?I believe I have had reports
>> >> of successful builds for SPARC, SH, Tile and GNU Hurd. ?I don't appear to
>> >> have had any reports of build results for Power Architecture, S390 or IA64
>> >> (and I also need to do an i386 build; x32 testing would also be good).
>> >> There was some discussion of IA64-specific bootstrap issues, but while
>> >> interesting I don't think that's relevant to this patch; what I want for
>> >> IA64 is to make sure that the patch
>> >> <http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2012-05/msg01920.html> (with or
>> >> without the possible sysdeps makefile additions I suggested) does not
>> >> break things, rather than that, given IA64-specific issues, it makes
>> >> things any better there.
>> >
>> > Ping, for Power, S390, IA64 and x32 testing. ?(I've now tested that this
>> > patch works OK on i386.) ?We're coming up to mainline reopening for 2.17
>> > and it would be good to have these test results before putting this patch
>> > in.
>> >
>>
>> Can you create a git branch I can test?
>
> I've created branch jsm28/libgcc with this patch.
>

No regressions on x32.

Thanks.


-- 
H.J.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]