This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: SH build problem with fanotify_mark

From: Kaz Kojima <kkojima at rr dot iij4u dot or dot jp>
To: roland at hack dot frob dot com
Cc: libc-alpha at sourceware dot org, thomas at codesourcery dot com
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 07:45:40 +0900 (JST)
Subject: Re: SH build problem with fanotify_mark
References: <20120728055124.739D52C0EB@topped-with-meat.com><20120728.160915.205445510.kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp><20120730181152.88B8E2C0C0@topped-with-meat.com>

Roland McGrath <roland@hack.frob.com> wrote:
>> fanotify_mark	EXTRA	fanotify_mark	i:iiiiis	__fanotify_mark	fanotify_mark@@GLIBC_2.16
> 
> Does this not get the right version without the @@... syntax?

I think so.  That @@... was proposed for the issue argued in
the thread started with

  http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2012-06/msg00294.html

for ABI baseline update.

Regards,
	kaz

References:
- Re: SH build problem with fanotify_mark
  - From: Roland McGrath
- Re: SH build problem with fanotify_mark
  - From: Kaz Kojima
- Re: SH build problem with fanotify_mark
  - From: Roland McGrath

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]