This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Monday 28 May 2012 17:43:04 Joseph S. Myers wrote: > I've tested this patch for x86_64 and also done a test build for ARM. > To go in it will certainly need more architecture testing (libc > architectures and IA64) - but since it seems likely that review will > point out changes that should be made, perhaps we could sort out any > such changes first so the architecture maintainers are testing a patch > that could, subject to such testing, go in? i tested glibc-2.16 with the patch merged into latest git (and tweaking it a little to apply). after disabling the long standing -lgcc_eh hack in our build system, i was able to bootstrap an ia64 cross-compiler fine: binutils, kernel/glibc headers, gcc stage1 (static C-only), full glibc, gcc stage2 (full C/C++/etc...). -mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |