Re: Patch for x86_32: Fix bug 14195

[Carlos O'Donell <carlos_odonell at mentor dot com>]

On 8/15/2012 4:01 PM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> On 08/15/2012 09:27 PM, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>> On 8/15/2012 3:11 PM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>>> Carlos, do you want the fix on the 2.16 branch as well?
>>> 
>>> Andreas
>> 
>> Yes. Could you please file a new bug, keyword glibc_2.16 and ask
>> for the commit to backport?
> 
> Do you really want a new bug for this? The backport is trivial (same
> patch) and I can just apply it to the branch if you like. I propose
> to reduce overhead in such situations.

That would be great, please apply to 2.15, and verify no regressions.

>> I've been shirking my 2.15 and 2.16 release branch maintainer
>> responsibilities, but I plan to do a bunch of changes tomorrow
>> (Thursday) and having a list to work from makes it easy.
> 
> Carlos, please remember to share the load - and that's what I over
> with committing the patch ;)

Thanks. It wasn't clear from your original message if *you* were going
to do the work or if you wanted *me* to do the work :-)

Cheers,
Carlos.
-- 
Carlos O'Donell
Mentor Graphics / CodeSourcery
carlos_odonell@mentor.com
carlos@codesourcery.com
+1 (613) 963 1026