This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Destructor support for C++11 thread_local variables

From: Roland McGrath <roland at hack dot frob dot com>
To: Richard Henderson <rth at twiddle dot net>
Cc: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh at redhat dot com>, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org, Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 17:09:53 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Destructor support for C++11 thread_local variables
References: <20121010210546.7322c6fa@spoyarek><20121010232019.15DE22C053@topped-with-meat.com><5076055C.3030500@twiddle.net>

> Loosely, construct on first use.
> 
> IOW we need not run constructors on tls variables for a thread until a
> function that touches those tls variables runs on that thread.

That's a straightforward specification that's perfectly clear to me.
So what's "loose"?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Destructor support for C++11 thread_local variables
  - From: Richard Henderson

References:
- [PATCH] Destructor support for C++11 thread_local variables
  - From: Siddhesh Poyarekar
- Re: [PATCH] Destructor support for C++11 thread_local variables
  - From: Roland McGrath
- Re: [PATCH] Destructor support for C++11 thread_local variables
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]