This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Kernel 3.6 changes: Add F_GETOWNER_UIDS in glibc's<bits/fcntl.h> ?
- From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov at openvz dot org>
- To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki dot motohiro at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot com>, libc-alpha <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>,Pavel Emelyanov <xemul at parallels dot com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 23:42:41 +0400
- Subject: Re: Kernel 3.6 changes: Add F_GETOWNER_UIDS in glibc's<bits/fcntl.h> ?
- References: <50786D3A.3090106@suse.com><CAHGf_=okanvHtjCEw-r4_LatWENOy=fk=8Os2OmRjekKh3AHdw@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 03:35:45PM -0400, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > Going through changes in 3.6, I noticed the addition of F_GETOWNER_UIDS in
> > fcntl.h and wonder whether we should add it to the glibc headers or not.
> >
> > Any advise is welcome,
>
> Please wait a while if you don't have a big reason. All of c/r feature
> are experimental.
> Several month ago, Andrew Morton said linux community might revert all of c/r
> patches if c/r folks are going to fail to implement concrete userland
> checkpoint and restore implementation.
I don't expect us to fail.