This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Should we compile x86-64 ld.so with -mno-sse -mno-sse?

From: Richard Henderson <rth at twiddle dot net>
To: Carlos O'Donell <carlos at systemhalted dot org>
Cc: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot com>, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org, "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2012 09:59:52 +1100
Subject: Re: Should we compile x86-64 ld.so with -mno-sse -mno-sse?
References: <20121031132245.GA2117@gmail.com> <2353366.qlHrN9GaAk@byrd> <CAE2sS1gsk4rLVj9duAy7Ws_3a9ywnY7NdaYb8iGxGayXaju5Lw@mail.gmail.com>

On 2012-11-01 03:10, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> What use case is there for not wanting to touch SEE in ld.so?

I can only imagine HJL is worried about AVX performance if the
dynamic linker uses SSE insns.


r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Should we compile x86-64 ld.so with -mno-sse -mno-sse?
  - From: H.J. Lu

References:
- Should we compile x86-64 ld.so with -mno-sse -mno-sse?
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: Should we compile x86-64 ld.so with -mno-sse -mno-sse?
  - From: Andreas Jaeger
- Re: Should we compile x86-64 ld.so with -mno-sse -mno-sse?
  - From: Carlos O'Donell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]