This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: libc git tst-array checks fail

From: Roland McGrath <roland at hack dot frob dot com>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
Cc: Klaus Dittrich <kladit at arcor dot de>, "Ryan S. Arnold" <ryan dot arnold at gmail dot com>, libc-alpha <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2012 01:04:38 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: libc git tst-array checks fail
References: <50950082.1070906@df1tl.local.here><CAAKybw8ELUjsNAP9KNQ+N2twUr6M7UcBkwYXabe9sTxjSk8xNA@mail.gmail.com><CAAKybw9QufPJg58BWKA+BVkNFO38L0NsTH7cZpY1Po+QsUSS1g@mail.gmail.com><509564A5.2030809@df1tl.local.here><CAMe9rOp+w9KdFyYKvdRhOiDD2z4mhOF-+U+TxGE8X6n2sZh5sg@mail.gmail.com><CAMe9rOrTyYj53uA6JTU6hR2NSWFWC4XOstQD17WheFyNfxoS5g@mail.gmail.com>

When was the priority field in the attribute syntax introduced?  If it was
after our minimum supported compiler version for building libc, then you
need to conditionalize the use of that syntax.  At any rate, it merits a
comment in the uses about why the priority matters to the test.


Thanks,
Roland

Follow-Ups:
- Re: libc git tst-array checks fail
  - From: H.J. Lu

References:
- libc git tst-array checks fail
  - From: Klaus Dittrich
- Re: libc git tst-array checks fail
  - From: Ryan S. Arnold
- Re: libc git tst-array checks fail
  - From: Ryan S. Arnold
- Re: libc git tst-array checks fail
  - From: Klaus Dittrich
- Re: libc git tst-array checks fail
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: libc git tst-array checks fail
  - From: H.J. Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]