This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Thursday 06 December 2012 16:35:33 Carlos O'Donell wrote: > On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote: > > From: Carlos O'Donell <carlos_odonell@mentor.com> > > > > Some arches do not have a __NR_fadvise64 but do have __NR_fadvise64_64. > > If the former is unavailable, fallback to the latter. > > > > Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> > > Reviewed-by: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@systemhalted.org> > > > 2012-12-06 Carlos O'Donell <carlos_odonell@mentor.com> > > > > Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> > > > > * sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/posix_fadvise.c (posix_fadvise): Also > > check for __NR_fadvise64_64. > > This is strictly a bug fix and should be OK for master right now. > > It also doesn't change the generated code for any working machines. > > This looks good to me and fixes fadvise on hppa where we have only > fadvise64_64. > > OK to checkin with copyright year update. done and done -mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |