This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: compiler standards (and/or min gcc version) supported withinstalled headers ?

From: Roland McGrath <roland at hack dot frob dot com>
To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 20:48:24 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: compiler standards (and/or min gcc version) supported withinstalled headers ?
References: <201212282357.52390.vapier@gentoo.org><20130109002625.648D42C08D@topped-with-meat.com><Pine.LNX.4.64.1301090157050.11486@digraph.polyomino.org.uk><20130110014733.BC5AA2C0CA@topped-with-meat.com><Pine.LNX.4.64.1301100229350.29477@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>

> On Wed, 9 Jan 2013, Roland McGrath wrote:
> 
> > Yeah.  OK, I relent.  C89 plus 'long long' is an acceptable baseline.
> 
> In that case, is the patch removing __GNUC__ conditionals on uses of "long 
> long" OK?

Yes, I think so though I'm not looking at it at the moment.

References:
- Re: compiler standards (and/or min gcc version) supported with installed headers ?
  - From: Roland McGrath
- Re: compiler standards (and/or min gcc version) supported withinstalled headers ?
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: compiler standards (and/or min gcc version) supported withinstalled headers ?
  - From: Roland McGrath
- Re: compiler standards (and/or min gcc version) supported withinstalled headers ?
  - From: Joseph S. Myers

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]