This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Implement x86 SIZE32/SIZE64 relocations


From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 12:56:07 -0800

> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 12:39 PM, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
>> From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
>> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 12:24:19 -0800
>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 12:14 PM, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
>>>> GLIBC dynamic linker support is the one that needs the largest amount
>>>> of lead time, and the one for which it is the most difficult for a
>>>> developer or use to integrate into their environment on their own.
>>>>
>>>> This even applies to the person who writes the binutils support for
>>>> emitting the relocations themselves.
>>>
>>> David, do you plan to add Sparc size relocation support to gas and
>>> ld? I choose "@SIZE" to indicate size relocation.  I will add both
>>> gas and ld tests for them.
>>
>> Yes I do.
>>
>> I intend to use whatever syntax Sun's assembler uses.
>>
>> Sun's assembler supports the x86 size relocations as well.
> 
> What does Sum assembler use for size relocations?
> I couldn't find an example.

Neither could I, as usual Oracle/Sun's documentation in this area is
very poor.

I'm asking one of my Oracle/Sun contacts.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]