This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Silence does not imply consensus.

From: fche at redhat dot com (Frank Ch. Eigler)
To: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at redhat dot com>
Cc: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh dot poyarekar at gmail dot com>, GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>, Roland McGrath <roland at hack dot frob dot com>
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2013 22:52:57 -0500
Subject: Re: Silence does not imply consensus.
References: <5138B55C.6090702@redhat.com><CAAHN_R1q18FVj7nhrsHHYsg0ds4MC3cZn28o=ZpMHA-DwXB-MQ@mail.gmail.com><5138CCE3.2080908@redhat.com>

"Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@redhat.com> writes:

> [...]
> - I don't really count as having an opinion because it presents
>   a conflict of interests since I'm strongly involved in helping
>   with the patch.
> [...]

(Is it uncontroversial that one is not supposed to count as having an
opinion on something one worked on?  IMHO, a well-established
maintainer working together with someone lends some positive weight as
to the wisdom of the approach, not a negligible one.)

- FChE

References:
- Silence does not imply consensus.
  - From: Carlos O'Donell
- Re: Silence does not imply consensus.
  - From: Siddhesh Poyarekar
- Re: Silence does not imply consensus.
  - From: Carlos O'Donell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]