This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
[COMMITTED] fi_FI: Define yesstr, nostr
- From: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at redhat dot com>
- To: myllynen at redhat dot com
- Cc: Keld Simonsen <keld at keldix dot com>, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
- Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2013 16:34:43 -0400
- Subject: [COMMITTED] fi_FI: Define yesstr, nostr
- References: <5141EF6D dot 9000601 at redhat dot com> <514334DF dot 8000306 at redhat dot com> <51434336 dot 3020103 at redhat dot com> <5149DAAA dot 9060309 at redhat dot com> <514A3E28 dot 6040409 at redhat dot com> <514ADCFA dot 7000009 at redhat dot com>
On 03/21/2013 06:12 AM, Marko Myllynen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2013-03-21 00:54, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>>
>> The fact that this is present in CLDR is the more important data point.
>> I'm going to assume that CLDR is authoritative here.
>>
>> I do agree with your recent comment about the fact that most experts
>> contribute to CLDR, and ICU also considers them canonical.
>>
>> I'll get this checked in ASAP.
>
> thanks, I'll update the bug 15264 accordingly after that.
Committed.
Updated BZ#15264.
I didn't add BZ#15264 to NEWS because it's not completely fixed.
commit 872c0acd85bd158d1c226f290b606d0e7717a2a1
Author: Marko Myllynen <myllynen@redhat.com>
Date: Sat Apr 6 16:33:26 2013 -0400
fi_FI: Define yesstr, nostr
Define yesstr/nostr in fi_FI (as "KyllÃ" and "Ei").
Fixes part of BZ#15264.
---
2013-04-06 Marko Myllynen <myllynen@redhat.com>
[BZ #15264]
* locales/fi_FI (LC_MESSAGES): Define yesstr and nostr.
Cheers,
Carlos.