This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Tracking patch pings
- From: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot com>
- To: libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
- Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 10:01:44 +0200
- Subject: Re: Tracking patch pings
- References: <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1305152117141 dot 21321 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <51948AF9 dot 7020702 at suse dot com> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1305161257580 dot 9498 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1305162206040 dot 1874 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk>
On 05/17/2013 12:23 AM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
And looking at April for pending patches, there are some more cases
although they are a bit less clear:
http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2013-04/msg00680.html (multiarch
support for PPC32) - not specifically proposed for 2.18, but it's
unfortunate there have been no comments at all.
http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2013-04/msg00475.html ([BZ #14932]
make dlsym return the newest symbol version) - some inconclusive
discussion (I think the proposed changed behavior is the most reasonable
thing for dlsym to do).
Yes, I agree with the comment - I'm just not sure what will break ;(
http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2013-04/msg00311.html (Properly handle
%W in strptime)
http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2013-04/msg00310.html (Properly cache
the result from looking up the nss database config)
http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2013-04/msg00309.html (Fix parsing of
numeric hosts in gethostbyname_r)
I reviewed the above three now.
thanks for the list,
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn,Jennifer Guild,Felix Imendörffer,HRB16746 (AG Nürnberg)
GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126