This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Tracking patch pings
- From: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh at redhat dot com>
- To: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot com>
- Cc: libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
- Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 15:13:43 +0530
- Subject: Re: Tracking patch pings
- References: <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1305152117141 dot 21321 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <51948AF9 dot 7020702 at suse dot com> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1305161257580 dot 9498 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1305162206040 dot 1874 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <5195E3E8 dot 7010305 at suse dot com>
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 10:01:44AM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> >http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2013-04/msg00311.html (Properly handle
> >%W in strptime)
> >
> >http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2013-04/msg00310.html (Properly cache
> >the result from looking up the nss database config)
> >
> >http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2013-04/msg00309.html (Fix parsing of
> >numeric hosts in gethostbyname_r)
>
> I reviewed the above three now.
I couldn't figure out if there was a consensus on using patchwork, so
for now I've added all the links Joseph posted to a wiki page:
http://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Pending%20Reviews
I hope this is helpful. I've skipped the two you have acked.
Siddhesh