This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH v2][BZ #12515] Improve precision of clock function


On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 09:00:09AM -0700, Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 05/21/13 08:34, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
> 
> > +    return (clock_t) ((ts.tv_nsec * CLOCKS_PER_SEC) / 1000000000
> > +		      + ts.tv_sec * CLOCKS_PER_SEC);
> 
> First, there's no need to cast to clock_t, and in general it's better
> to avoid casts if they're not needed.

OK, cast removed.
 
> Second, ts.tv_nsec * CLOCKS_PER_SEC might overflow on a machine
> with 32-bit 'long', and afterwards the resulting division by 1000000000
> won't wrap around to the "correct" value.
> 
> How about this instead?
> 
> 	return (ts.tv_sec * CLOCKS_PER_SEC
> 		+ ts.tv_nsec / (1000000000 / CLOCKS_PER_SEC));

Thanks, patch updated and tested.  OK to go in with this change?
After the PLT fix is reviewed of course.

Siddhesh

2013-05-21  Siddhesh Poyarekar  <siddhesh@redhat.com>
	    Paul Eggert  <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>

	[BZ #12515]
	* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/clock.c (clock): Use result from
	CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID clock if available.


diff --git a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/clock.c b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/clock.c
index 5268d33..e4e2065 100644
--- a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/clock.c
+++ b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/clock.c
@@ -23,6 +23,14 @@
 clock_t
 clock (void)
 {
+  struct timespec ts;
+
+  if (__clock_gettime (CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID, &ts) == 0)
+    return (ts.tv_sec * CLOCKS_PER_SEC
+	    + ts.tv_nsec / (1000000000 / CLOCKS_PER_SEC));
+
+  /* clock_gettime failed.  This will only occur if CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID is
+     not supported by the kernel.  Fall back to __times.  */
   struct tms buf;
   long clk_tck = __sysconf (_SC_CLK_TCK);
 


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]