This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Update on freeze status of glibc 2.18?
- From: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot com>
- To: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh dot poyarekar at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com>, GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>, Ryan Arnold <rsa at us dot ibm dot com>, "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh at redhat dot com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 08:54:00 +0200
- Subject: Re: Update on freeze status of glibc 2.18?
- References: <51B65DE4 dot 4010107 at redhat dot com> <CAAHN_R1tqu4j3y-E1wV3NDF9nOTHtU_toiEwgeXLTSamTOtBdw at mail dot gmail dot com> <51B68D07 dot 80908 at redhat dot com> <CAAHN_R1h_Xb4GttYcJxADjc-jUKbmggEsbXVcV-Qg7RwQv6fyw at mail dot gmail dot com>
On 06/11/2013 05:29 AM, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
On 11 June 2013 08:05, Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com> wrote:
I don't know that any of those patches, aside from multiarch PPC32
support, warrants waiting.
One additional point.
I had done a rebase of the latest upstream master in Fedora rawhide
last week and the build threw up a few testsuite failures. Most of
them seem to be specific to some patches we're carrying in Fedora, but
I found at least one breakage that may be relevant. Do such testsuite
failures qualify as blockers or do we consider them on a case by case
basis?
Please bring them up here and let's discuss them - without further
details, I won't say anything regarding blocker ;)
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn,Jennifer Guild,Felix Imendörffer,HRB16746 (AG Nürnberg)
GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126