This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Regenerate x86 and x86_64 ulps
- From: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Andi Kleen <andi at firstfloor dot org>
- Cc: Jeroen <_jeroen_ at yahoo dot com>, "libc-alpha at sourceware dot org" <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2013 14:45:05 +0000
- Subject: Re: Regenerate x86 and x86_64 ulps
- References: <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1307022001020 dot 28677 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <1372836611 dot 94370 dot YahooMailNeo at web124504 dot mail dot ne1 dot yahoo dot com> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1307031352210 dot 18167 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <20130703143742 dot GL6123 at two dot firstfloor dot org>
On Wed, 3 Jul 2013, Andi Kleen wrote:
> My FC14 setup with gcc 4.5 is totally unable to pass even a fraction
> of the math tests on 32bit. 64bit works. With gcc 4.7 on FC16
> things also work on 32bit and 64bit.
If you don't now have any useful ulps regeneration to do with 4.5 or 4.6
then please close bug 15487 (possibly documenting the problems with 4.5 on
the wiki page for 2.18). The failures you attached to that bug are just
small ulps differences for which "make regen-ulps" and checking in the
regeneration would be appropriate - are you saying you now get much more
major issues when building with those compilers?
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com