This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: glibc 2.18 machine status?
- From: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at redhat dot com>
- To: Marcus Shawcroft <marcus dot shawcroft at linaro dot org>
- Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>, "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>, Thomas Schwinge <thomas at codesourcery dot com>, Roland McGrath <roland at hack dot frob dot com>, Andreas Krebbel <krebbel at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com>, David Miller <davem at davemloft dot net>, Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo dot org>, Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf at tilera dot com>, Andreas Schwab <schwab at linux-m68k dot org>
- Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 14:41:19 -0400
- Subject: Re: glibc 2.18 machine status?
- References: <51E5C427 dot 60304 at redhat dot com> <CABXK9ndCEJsecoSPKqfCBaZQN+0p0raZgG0Z-4d=NtmodjJCHg at mail dot gmail dot com>
On 07/19/2013 04:34 AM, Marcus Shawcroft wrote:
> On 16 July 2013 23:07, Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Community,
>>
>> How are the machine builds going?
>> Marcus, How is AArch64?
>
> I've run the testsuite, there are 16 new failures in long-double
> related to missing underflow in casin and it looks like this patch
> http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-ports/2013-05/msg00087.html didn't
> update libc.abilist w.r.t. mcount and _mcount. I'll post a patch for
> the latter shortly.
Could you please update the wiki with your status notes?
This gives everyone else looking at 2.18 the official upstream baseline.
http://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Release/2.18#Current_Status
Cheers,
Carlos.