This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Port of lock elision to System/z v2
- From: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot com>
- To: libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
- Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 13:50:43 +0200
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Port of lock elision to System/z v2
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20130920105925 dot GA374 at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com> <523C2BC1 dot 2050707 at suse dot com> <20130920111704 dot GA3400 at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com>
On 09/20/2013 01:17 PM, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> Then why was exactly this detail level acceptable for the Intel
> lock elision patch?
Dominik, please double check.
I see:
2013-07-02 Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Hongjiu Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
* pthread_mutex_lock.c
(__pthread_mutex_lock): Add lock elision support.
* pthread_mutex_timedlock.c (pthread_mutex_timedlock): Likewise.
So, it names not only the file but also the function changed - nothing
like this is seen in your change.
Also, the first entry contains a text, the rest "Likewise."
Hope that helps,
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter/Identica: jaegerandi
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn,Jennifer Guild,Felix Imendörffer,HRB16746 (AG Nürnberg)
GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126