This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: prlimit64: inconsistencies between kernel and userland
- From: Andreas Schwab <schwab at linux-m68k dot org>
- To: Rich Felker <dalias at aerifal dot cx>
- Cc: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, David Daney <ddaney dot cavm at gmail dot com>, "Pinski\, Andrew" <Andrew dot Pinski at caviumnetworks dot com>, Andreas Barth <aba at ayous dot org>, David Miller <davem at davemloft dot net>, aurelien at aurel32 dot net, linux-mips at linux-mips dot org, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
- Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 00:52:14 +0100
- Subject: Re: prlimit64: inconsistencies between kernel and userland
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20130628133835 dot GA21839 at hall dot aurel32 dot net> <20131104213756 dot GD18700 at hall dot aurel32 dot net> <20131104 dot 194519 dot 1657797548878784116 dot davem at davemloft dot net> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1311050058580 dot 9883 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <20131105012203 dot GA24286 at brightrain dot aerifal dot cx> <20131105085859 dot GE28240 at mails dot so dot argh dot org> <20131105183732 dot GB24286 at brightrain dot aerifal dot cx> <52793C50 dot 9030300 at gmail dot com> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1311052234420 dot 30260 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <20131105223953 dot GG24286 at brightrain dot aerifal dot cx>
Rich Felker <dalias@aerifal.cx> writes:
> BTW, what happens on a distro where -dev packages are separate and the
> user compiles with old headers (not having upgraded the dev package)
> but new libc.so? :-)
The devel package must either be self-contained or require the matching
non-devel package.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."