This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Wednesday 02 October 2013 17:31:13 Carlos O'Donell wrote: > The standard design pattern for making it optional to link against > libpthread is to mark the function weak, test if the function > address is non-zero and call the function, otherwise use a fallback. how does this gel with all the forwarding funcs we have in libc.so today (nptl/forward.c) ? are those the wrong/old pattern then ? or is the NULL test meant for static code and the dummy funcs meant for shared library code ? seems weird that nptl/forward.c misses a large number of functions from the current pthreads API. -mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |