This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Wiki discussion of standards conformance issues
- From: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- To: <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 22:37:54 +0000
- Subject: Wiki discussion of standards conformance issues
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
I've added a section
<https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Development_Todo/Master#Standards_conformance>
to the wiki todo list discussing standards conformance issues in glibc.
Does anyone have comments on the question of marking conformance bugs in
Bugzilla (my suggestion is keywords std-c90, std-posix2008, etc.,
indicating that a bug is related to conformance to a given standard - not
necessarily that it's a conformance bug, as it might relate to a missing
optional feature)?
Where the wiki page list links to a past discussion, which in turn links
to other past discussions, it would be useful it someone could extract all
the possibly-not-fully-resolved conformance-related issues from those
discussions and ensure they go in appropriately tagged Bugzilla bugs or on
the wiki page (items where it still needs to be worked out whether there
is a current problem could also go on the wiki page).
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com