This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 02/12/2014 10:14 PM, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
On 02/12/2014 03:52 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:On 02/12/2014 09:25 PM, Carlos O'Donell wrote:I'll let Florian comment on the other points.I already replied offlist: I looked a bit around and it seems the BSDs already have these constants under slightly different names, ND_RA_FLAG_RTPREF_LOW etc., plus _MASK and _RSV constants. This might be sufficient reason to include these constants.Right, we need a standard set of defines. Do these constants exist in the Linux kernel?
Not as far as I can tell.
Would a sensible person reading the RFCs come up with the same constant names?
This seems fairly unlikely. RFC 4191 does not use symbolic constants at all.
-- Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security Team
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |