This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Patchwork for glibc?
- From: Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana dot gcc at googlemail dot com>
- To: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>
- Cc: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at redhat dot com>, Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo dot org>, GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 17:54:36 +0000
- Subject: Re: Patchwork for glibc?
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <52FE35BC dot 3000908 at redhat dot com> <52FE4FF4 dot 6090004 at redhat dot com>
- Reply-to: ramrad01 at arm dot com
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 5:18 PM, Jeff Law <law@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 02/14/14 08:26, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>>
>> Mike,
>>
>> Any progress on getting patchwork for glibc setup?
>>
>> I reviewed some stale patches last night and wasted my time :-(
>
> FWIW, I've asked Ramana to propose a BOF on patch review systems at the
> Cauldron. glibc isn't the only project in need of something other than
> developer mailboxes as a mechanism for managing patch review.
I'm quite tired as well of stale patches in mailboxes and the
associated pain we have in all the communities. I've got a few ideas
based on looking at some available tools like phabricator and
reviewboard but I'm not in a position to have a meaningful discussion.
I have seen the earlier traffic on this topic in all the lists that I
read and will take that into account before writing something down.
regards
Ramana
>
> jeff