This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Setting up patchwork on sourceware
- From: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at redhat dot com>
- To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh at redhat dot com>
- Cc: OndÅej BÃlka <neleai at seznam dot cz>, Adhemerval Zanella <azanella at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com>, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
- Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 13:51:21 -0400
- Subject: Re: Setting up patchwork on sourceware
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20140306194636 dot GB1722 at spoyarek dot pnq dot redhat dot com> <5319204D dot 7090802 at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com> <20140307062516 dot GC1722 at spoyarek dot pnq dot redhat dot com> <20140307145135 dot GD1722 at spoyarek dot pnq dot redhat dot com> <20140318094039 dot GA8415 at domone dot podge> <20140318102227 dot GS1850 at spoyarek dot pnq dot redhat dot com> <53285733 dot 9000300 at redhat dot com> <20140318145426 dot GT1850 at spoyarek dot pnq dot redhat dot com> <5328642E dot 9060001 at redhat dot com> <20140321162007 dot GN1850 at spoyarek dot pnq dot redhat dot com> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1403211630100 dot 4557 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk>
On 03/21/2014 12:30 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Mar 2014, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 11:20:14AM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>>> Thanks. I'll copy-edit. Tell me when it's ready.
>>
>> It is now:
>>
>> https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Patch%20Review%20Workflow
>
> What's the right state for "the patch was only ever an RFC or proof of
> concept rather than proposed for inclusion as-is"?
If a patch was an RFC, one should mark it state=RFC, such that
other reviewers not interested in reviewing RFCs may ignore that
patch.
If a patch was an RFC, but meant for inclusion as-is if accepted,
then you could check it in if you had consensus, at which point
you'd mark it state=Accepted, otherwise state=Rejected, or
if it needed work state=Changes Requested (and the author needs
to resubmit the new version).
Does that answer your question?
Cheers,
Carlos.