RE: [PATCH 2/N, MPX, x86_64] Intel MPX support in glibc for x86_64

["Zamyatin, Igor" <igor dot zamyatin at intel dot com>]

Make check and make xcheck are fine with the patch


Thanks,
Igor

> -----Original Message-----
> From: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org [mailto:libc-alpha-
> owner@sourceware.org] On Behalf Of Zamyatin, Igor
> Sent: Friday, April 11, 2014 1:26 AM
> To: Richard Henderson; H.J. Lu
> Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/N, MPX, x86_64] Intel MPX support in glibc for x86_64
> 
> Then I'm going to test attached patch.
> 
> Thanks,
> Igor
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Richard Henderson [mailto:rth7680@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
> > Richard Henderson
> > Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 5:38 AM
> > To: H.J. Lu
> > Cc: Zamyatin, Igor; libc-alpha@sourceware.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/N, MPX, x86_64] Intel MPX support in glibc for
> > x86_64
> >
> > On 04/09/2014 05:12 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > >> Wouldn't it be just as easy to do
> > >>
> > >>   .byte 0x66,0x0f,0x1b,0x84,0x24; .long LR_BND_OFFSET
> > >>
> > >> after all, you know how and where that offset is going to be encoded.
> > >
> > > Sure.  We can do that after verifying LR_BND_OFFSET >= 0x80.
> >
> > No need for that, since the previous bytes have encoded the form that
> > expects a 4-byte offset.  The offset can be anything at all within those
> bytes.
> >
> >
> > r~