This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Updated rwlock-in-C patchkit
- From: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at redhat dot com>
- To: Andi Kleen <andi at firstfloor dot org>, Torvald Riegel <triegel at redhat dot com>
- Cc: OndÅej BÃlka <neleai at seznam dot cz>, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
- Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 19:13:12 -0400
- Subject: Re: Updated rwlock-in-C patchkit
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <1395789863-5026-1-git-send-email-andi at firstfloor dot org> <1397248605 dot 10643 dot 18269 dot camel at triegel dot csb> <53497694 dot 4040901 at redhat dot com> <20140412194007 dot GA1284 at domone dot podge> <1397402907 dot 10643 dot 19303 dot camel at triegel dot csb> <534B8B38 dot 8090402 at redhat dot com> <8761m9iekn dot fsf at tassilo dot jf dot intel dot com> <87mwfifiks dot fsf at tassilo dot jf dot intel dot com>
On 04/18/2014 05:12 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> writes:
>
>> "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@redhat.com> writes:
>>>
>>> That's right. I'd like to see the whatever code was used to benchmark
>>> the performance submitted as a microbenchmark so I can run it myself
>>> and verify. Again, it's not that I don't trust Andi, but an objective
>>> evaluation is always going to be the best defense for these changes.
>>
>> Here is the code I used:
>
> Any comments now? Is the code ok to commit now?
>
> If yes please someone with access rights commit it.
Sorry, April is busy.
Torvlad, Have you had a chance to look at this?
Cheers,
Carlos.