This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 09:42:24AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Indeed, that implies a bootstrap almost like for a new architecture, > except the manual bootstrap can be done more easily. That's why I talked > about "huge work" in the other mail. The question is if it is worth doing all this. SONAME bumps or hacks to the dynamic linker will still not fixed binaries that were built on 2.19 and expected that ABI to be present in libc.so.6. Instead of adding such convoluted hackery to support what is fundamentally a breakage which should never have happened, we should just reverse that breakage and introduce the hardware support in a different non-ABI-breaking manner, maybe in 2.21. Siddhesh
Attachment:
pgpJTXF_uZJG7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |