This is the mail archive of the
libc-hacker@sourceware.cygnus.com
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: obnoxious "not implemented" messages
- To: libc-hacker@gnu.org
- Subject: Re: obnoxious "not implemented" messages
- From: smurf@noris.de (Matthias Urlichs)
- Date: 17 Aug 1998 07:01:19 +0200
- Newsgroups: dist.glibc
- Organization: noris network GmbH, Nuernberg, FRG
- References: <199807281645.MAA09345@rabi.phys.columbia.edu> <19980729222332.A19604@dot.cygnus.com> <r2ww8vevsf.fsf@happy.cygnus.com> <901778688.5068@noris.de>
- Xref: noris.net dist.glibc:5879
drepper@cygnus.com (Ulrich Drepper) writes:
>
> The only reason Zack cares about this is since his test suite will see
> the messages when looking at the results from the libm-test.c use. No
> working program ever will use the functions. And if a program really
> uses them I want to know why it breaks and not have a rather cryptic
> diagnosis via a SNaN.
>
Then why not leave them undefined in the first place, or use a linkage
warning?
--
Matthias Urlichs
noris network GmbH