Re: glibc 2.1 is broken.

[smurf@noris.de (Matthias Urlichs)]

hjl@lucon.org (H.J. Lu) writes:
> 
> glibc 2.1 is broken. I am trying to find out why.

I just _love_ the amount of detail you sometimes provide in your mails.

Part of the problem is that some people (like me...) read glibc (a)
infrequently and/or (b) with some sort of threading mailer. I just cannot
see from this note whether this problem has already been fixed, because the
"it works again" message may have been a reply to a previous mail which I
saw earlier.

So might I respectfully request an additional sentence or two..?

-- 
Matthias Urlichs      |        noris network GmbH      |       smurf@noris.de
The quote was selected randomly. Really.    |      http://www.noris.de/~smurf/
-- 
The confusion of a staff member is measured by the length of
his memos.
                                -- New York Times, Jan. 20, 1981