Re: glibc-2.0.7: patch for ntp_{get,adj}time

[Ulrich Drepper <drepper@cygnus.com>]

"Ulrich Windl" <ulrich.windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de> writes:

> I'm not a glibc guru, but I've tried to make a patch to implement the 
> missing functions ntp_gettime() and ntp_adjtime() that some users 
> complain about. Maybe you can apply the glibc guidelines where 
> necessary. Especially I'm no specialist in writing texinfo 
> documentation...

Thanks, I've added the patch, a little bit modified though.

But I have a problem with it.  On Solaris 7 ntp_adjtime is defined like this:

	int ntp_adjtime(struct timex *);

So the question is: where does the amode argument in your version come
from?  I'm no expert in all this NTP stuff so I don't dare to judge
about this.

If anybody reading this knows more about NTP please talk to me.

-- 
---------------.      drepper at gnu.org  ,-.   1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper  \    ,-------------------'   \  Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Cygnus Solutions `--' drepper at cygnus.com   `------------------------