This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
>>>>> Jakub Jelinek writes: Jakub> On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 10:32:01AM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote: >> >>>>> Ulrich Drepper writes: >> Uli> Roland McGrath <roland@frob.com> writes: >> >> Conversely, perhaps ldconfig should use ${prefix}-based file names when >> >> ${prefix}!=/usr so that you would get a separate ld.so.cache universe for >> >> your separate libc installation. >> Uli> Volunteers? >> >> Yes. Here's a patch. Ok to commit? Jakub> Also, Andreas, could ldconfig be made a little bit more silent unless -v is Jakub> given to it? Jakub> It complains without -v about several things H.J.'s ldconfig complained with Jakub> -v only, and people seem to be really confused by that. Jakub> Would you mind if I moved some of the error calls undef opt_verbose if? Jakub> It confuses people e.g. when using rpm when foo package contains the shared Jakub> library and foo-devel a .so symlink to it, then there is always some time Jakub> when both are upgraded when some symlink is stale (either points to the Jakub> older or newer library) and if ldconfig is called during that time period, Jakub> it complains. Go ahead and send a patch. I don't think I'll mind but like to see the patch first. Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger SuSE Labs aj@suse.de private aj@arthur.inka.de
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |