This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
On Fri, Sep 22, 2000 at 03:29:10PM -0500, Mark Brown wrote: > > > "H . J . Lu" wrote: > > The initial value of @code{errno} at program startup is zero. Many > > library functions are guaranteed to set it to certain nonzero values > > when they encounter certain kinds of errors. These error conditions are > > listed for each function. These functions do not change @code{errno} > > when they succeed; > > --- > > > > I have quoted it in my previous email. Did I read it wrong? > > Nope, I apologize -- but that last sentence is both bad and wrong, IMHO. > Right or wrong. It is the documented glibc behavior and used to be accurates. If we changed it, some applications may not work right. H.J.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |