This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: A patch for stdio-common/sprintf.c

To: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at cygnus dot com>
Subject: Re: A patch for stdio-common/sprintf.c
From: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at valinux dot com>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 16:53:21 -0700
Cc: GNU C Library <libc-hacker at sourceware dot cygnus dot com>
References: <20001016105647.A20132@valinux.com> <m366ms78gi.fsf@otr.mynet.cygnus.com>

On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 03:00:13PM -0700, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> "H . J . Lu" <hjl@valinux.com> writes:
> 
> > We use ... in stdio-common/fprintf.c. Wny not do it for
> > stdio-common/sprintf.c?
> 
> Well, if you would say why you want to see this change the decision
> would be easier.  I don't know why it's using K&R syntax but I cannot
> exclude that it is for a reason.  Is the current code failing
> somewhere?
> 

Consistent and less confusing.


-- 
H.J. Lu (hjl@gnu.org)

References:
- A patch for stdio-common/sprintf.c
  - From: H . J . Lu
- Re: A patch for stdio-common/sprintf.c
  - From: Ulrich Drepper

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]