This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
"H . J . Lu" <hjl@valinux.com> writes: > Some functions have different versions in libc and libpthread. For > example, pread has GLIBC_2.1 in libc and GLIBC_2.2 in libpthread. > I can imagine potential problems with it. Shouldn't a fuction have > the same verion cross all libraries? The names, although the same in all libraries, are completely separated. They don't stand alone, they are used as a tuple (library,version). It doesn't matter whether a symbol has different names in different DSOs. -- ---------------. ,-. 1325 Chesapeake Terrace Ulrich Drepper \ ,-------------------' \ Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `------------------------
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |