This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com> writes: > Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de> writes: > > > On both my P3 and my Athlon with both gcc 2.95.2 and gcc from CVS, I > > got some problems libm-test after the constants have been changed to > > long double. > > > > I've committed the appended patch, > > I prefer to not have this. I have a PIII as well and don't see any > problems. So this must be a compiler issue. If gcc 2.95 generates > wrong code it cannot be used. If (what is more likely) it generates > code which causes the loss of precision the C code must be made more > stable so that a different compiler makes no difference. > > Please undo the patch and look at the code difference between 2.95 and > what ever other gcc version. I'll undo it for now and will look what the differences are. What compiler flags are you using? It might be that this is one issue why you don't see it and I see it. Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger SuSE Labs aj@suse.de private aj@arthur.inka.de http://www.suse.de/~aj
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |