This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: more testing needed

To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
Subject: Re: more testing needed
From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>
Date: 29 Jun 2001 09:59:56 -0700
Cc: GNU libc hacker <libc-hacker at sourceware dot cygnus dot com>
References: <m3ae2rg3or.fsf@otr.mynet><20010629111222.A737@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz>
Reply-To: drepper at cygnus dot com (Ulrich Drepper)

Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> writes:

> I think libgcc_s.so.1 vs. GLIBC needs to be resolved, see my mail in
> `GCC 3.0 and GLIBC don't work together' thread on libc-alpha.
> I think glibc 2.2.4 should be compilable by GCC 3.0 now when it is released.

I don't see this as a requirement.  In fact, I have no interest to
introduce such major changes.

> Before I hack something, I'd like to know what you and other folks think is
> best (so far I have just heard from H.J.).

You won't hear anything from me.  I refuse to look at this.

-- 
---------------.                          ,-.   1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper  \    ,-------------------'   \  Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Red Hat          `--' drepper at redhat.com   `------------------------

Follow-Ups:
- Re: more testing needed
  - From: Andreas Jaeger

References:
- more testing needed
  - From: Ulrich Drepper
- Re: more testing needed
  - From: Jakub Jelinek

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]