This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Mark Brown <bmark@us.ibm.com> writes: > There is actually a Permanent Interpretation already made for this in the > SUS (Note that strptime is "XSI" in the Austin document, > which means it is a part of the UNIX trademark standard but not POSIX). > [...] Thanks, Mark. I don't want to preach or say "told you" etc. But this should clearly show that test suites cannot be trusted when it comes to standard compliance. Especially the OpenGroup test suites only test what currently certfied Unixes do. Whenever a new Unix (not derived from the initial sources) was tested the test suite had to be modified. This will be the same with Linux. So, if you are working with test suites it might be good to look more critical at the test suite than at the existing code. It's not that the code we currently use is new and real problems will probably have been recognized and fixed. -- ---------------. ,-. 1325 Chesapeake Terrace Ulrich Drepper \ ,-------------------' \ Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `------------------------
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |