This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Using INT in libc-symbols was not the best idea, we now get a lot of warnings since INT was used previously: ../sysdeps/generic/strtol.c:62:1: warning: "INT" redefined ../include/libc-symbols.h:355:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition ../sysdeps/generic/strtol.c:64:1: warning: "INT" redefined ../include/libc-symbols.h:355:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition tst-printf.c:77:1: warning: "INT" redefined ../include/libc-symbols.h:358:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition How should we solve this issue? I would suggest to use INTNAME instead of INT in libc-symbols.h. What do you think? Shall I send a patch? Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger SuSE Labs aj@suse.de private aj@arthur.inka.de http://www.suse.de/~aj
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |