This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix nice

From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
Cc: Glibc hackers <libc-hacker at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: 01 Mar 2002 16:32:32 -0800
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix nice
References: <20020228231524.F2204@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz>

Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> writes:

> 2002-02-28  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>
> 
> 	* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/nice.c: New file.
> 
> --- libc/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/nice.c.jj	Thu Feb 28 23:12:51 2002
> +++ libc/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/nice.c	Thu Feb 28 23:15:06 2002
> @@ -0,0 +1 @@
> +#include <sysdeps/unix/nice.c>

Why do you want to avoid using the nice() syscall?  If the syscall is
returning the wrong value this can be fixed.  But using
getpriority/setpriority seems not the smartest thing to do.

-- 
---------------.                          ,-.   1325 Chesapeake Terrace
Ulrich Drepper  \    ,-------------------'   \  Sunnyvale, CA 94089 USA
Red Hat          `--' drepper at redhat.com   `------------------------

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Fix nice
  - From: Andreas Schwab

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]