This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: ready for 2.3?

Hi Uli,

there is one patch for the nice() emulation from me, where I and
Andreas Jaeger already asked you for inclusion in the official tree,
but never got an answer. Since all Linux Distributions have this
patch in their glibc version, I think we should include it in the
official release.

The problem is, that, if the result of the current priority of a
process and the added nice value is out of the priority range, nice
should return the new priority which is really used, and not our
calculated value:

2002-03-02  Thorsten Kukuk  <kukuk@suse.de>

        * sysdeps/unix/nice.c: Use getpriority() for the return value

--- sysdeps/unix/nice.c
+++ sysdeps/unix/nice.c 2002/03/02 09:40:14
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@
 
   result = setpriority (PRIO_PROCESS, 0, prio + incr);
   if (result != -1)
-    return prio + incr;
+    return getpriority (PRIO_PROCESS, 0);
   else
     return -1;

-- 
Thorsten Kukuk       http://www.suse.de/~kukuk/        kukuk@suse.de
SuSE Linux AG        Deutschherrnstr. 15-19        D-90429 Nuernberg
--------------------------------------------------------------------    
Key fingerprint = A368 676B 5E1B 3E46 CFCE  2D97 F8FD 4E23 56C6 FB4B
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]