This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: static _int_malloc et al

From: Wolfram Gloger <wmglo at dent dot med dot uni-muenchen dot de>
To: drepper at redhat dot com, roland at redhat dot com, libc-hacker at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: 7 Jan 2003 09:12:31 -0000
Subject: Re: static _int_malloc et al
References: <200301070750.h077oNi07630@magilla.sf.frob.com> <3E1A8C20.90001@redhat.com> <20030107090754.13210.qmail@md.dent.med.uni-muenchen.de>

> - when the spinlock patch is in, they can even be used safely from
>   within a signal handler.

Scratch that, it should simply read "they can even be used safely from
within a signal handler."  No spinlock required when you generate the
arena within the signal handler.

Regards,
Wolfram.

References:
- static _int_malloc et al
  - From: Roland McGrath
- Re: static _int_malloc et al
  - From: Ulrich Drepper
- Re: static _int_malloc et al
  - From: Wolfram Gloger

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]