This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Steve Munroe <sjmunroe@us.ibm.com> writes: > Is anyone else seeing make check failures in tst-nanosleep and > tst-clock_nanosleep? > > I see these fail at various times (7.5%+ failure rate) on PPC64 (both 2.4 > and 2.5) kernels running either PPC32 or PPC64 applications. These are all > SMP machines. In each case the measured time averages 0.5 jiffies less > than 1 second! > > The nanosleep code is in the kernel is arch independent so I would expect > this test to fail on the SMP platforms? Perhaps your clock is going wrong? The time keeping code is architecture dependend... Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger SuSE Labs aj@suse.de private aj@arthur.inka.de http://www.suse.de/~aj
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |