This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Convert prototypes to ISO C90

From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>
To: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>
Cc: GNU libc hacker <libc-hacker at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 11:05:39 -0700
Subject: Re: Convert prototypes to ISO C90
Organization: Red Hat, Inc.
References: <u81xu3fq7e.fsf@gromit.moeb> <3F74735E.1020303@redhat.com> <u8wubve8i8.fsf@gromit.moeb>

Andreas Jaeger wrote:

> They avoid redundancy (variable is only used once) and are clearer IMHO,

The reason why in many places K&R is used is to get exactly the right
level of warnings re missing prototypes.  Leave it as is, there is no
reason to change it.

-- 
--------------.                        ,-.            444 Castro Street
Ulrich Drepper \    ,-----------------'   \ Mountain View, CA 94041 USA
Red Hat         `--' drepper at redhat.com `---------------------------

References:
- Convert prototypes to ISO C90
  - From: Andreas Jaeger
- Re: Convert prototypes to ISO C90
  - From: Ulrich Drepper
- Re: Convert prototypes to ISO C90
  - From: Andreas Jaeger

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]