This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.
Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Hi Ulrich, > > For s390-64 we do not have the problem because there fadvise64_64 > > has only 4 parameters. > > s390-64 does not need this syscall. You're the third 64-bit platform > maintainer making that mistake. This is a new syscall which is only > needed for 32-bit platforms. If the kernel defines it for s390-64, > remove it again, it's complete waste. I wondered about it already. The current vanilla kernel don't have a fadvise64_64 for s390* at all. I won't add it. The patch is still valid, it is for s390-32 only. blue skies, Martin
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |