This is the mail archive of the libc-hacker@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the glibc project.

Note that libc-hacker is a closed list. You may look at the archives of this list, but subscription and posting are not open.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: ia64 clock_gettime and HP_TIMING

From: David Mosberger <davidm at napali dot hpl dot hp dot com>
To: Jes Sorensen <jes at wildopensource dot com>
Cc: Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>, davidm at hpl dot hp dot com,libc-hacker at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 11:29:44 -0800
Subject: Re: ia64 clock_gettime and HP_TIMING
References: <16306.21333.78785.923547@gargle.gargle.HOWL><3FB2751B.9010302@redhat.com><yq0vfpo1xqd.fsf@trained-monkey.org><3FB34B5A.2040209@redhat.com><yq0n0b01jqr.fsf@trained-monkey.org><16308.3006.52067.235699@napali.hpl.hp.com><yq0smkr2sw8.fsf@trained-monkey.org><3FB515DC.9010909@redhat.com><yq0isl08rlw.fsf@wildopensource.com><yq0he09rogb.fsf@wildopensource.com><3FD7AABA.9040809@redhat.com><yq0llpj3a8p.fsf@wildopensource.com>
Reply-to: davidm at hpl dot hp dot com

>>>>> On 11 Dec 2003 05:43:50 -0500, Jes Sorensen <jes@wildopensource.com> said:

  Jes> I might be confused so feel free to correct me if I misread it
  Jes> again.

I also concluded that the code is _probably_ correct but that it's
exceptionally hard to follow it.  It's full of double negations!
Perhaps that could be improved?

	--david

References:
- Re: ia64 clock_gettime and HP_TIMING
  - From: Jes Sorensen
- Re: ia64 clock_gettime and HP_TIMING
  - From: Jes Sorensen
- Re: ia64 clock_gettime and HP_TIMING
  - From: Ulrich Drepper
- Re: ia64 clock_gettime and HP_TIMING
  - From: Jes Sorensen

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]